"Gilmore" Guy: Who is New Showrunner David Rosenthal?

A few days later and I am still processing the news that Gilmore Girls showrunner Amy Sherman-Palladino--and her exceptionally talented husband, writer and producer Daniel Palladino--announced their departure from the whip-smart drama after six seasons. The news wouldn't be such a blow, save for the fact that Gilmore Girls is as much about Amy and Daniel as it is about Lorelai and Rory.

In their capable hands, the show explored a supremely complicated family dynamic through the beautiful friendship of mother and daughter Lorelai and Rory... and did so with smart dialogue usually found in a Nick & Nora film rather than on television. Zany subplots abounded as did quirky, beloved supporting characters. And now, after six seasons (including this most recent--and very shaky--season where Amy and Daniel wrote less episodes than usual), Amy and Daniel are passing on the showrunning torch to... Dave Rosenthal?!?

For those of you in the audience unfamiliar with David Rosenthal, here's a quick primer on his credits. He joined the Gilmore Girls writing staff at the beginning of the 2005-2006 season and has only written one episode of the show--"The UnGraduate"--to date (though his second scripted episode, "Super Cool Party People," airs tomorrow night). Prior to Gilmore Girls, his writing credits included the abysmal comedies Hope & Faith and Good Morning, Miami and he served as an executive producer on Spin City. Hardly the guy you'd expect to take over the reins from Amy to oversee Gilmore Girls.

Hoping to learn more about this guy, I tracked down a rather infamous Los Angeles Times Magazine article on Rosenthal, written by Janet Reitman, from 2002, entitled "The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Ranter." Informative reading to say the least. According to Reitman, Rosenthal's success in Hollywood was meteoric by anyone's standards. A 1989 graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and the son of a rabbi, Rosenthal moved to Los Angeles shortly after graduation to pursue his dream of writing sitcoms.

Within a year, Rosenthal swiftly jumped from being a production assistant on Anything but Love (a sitcom which starred Richard Lewis and Jamie Lee Curtis) to staff writer on the same show; then two years later, another jump, this time to a head writer position on Ellen (yes, that Ellen; Rosenthal stayed for three years and then was reportedly fired). After a year-long stint developing sitcoms for Jeffrey Katzenberg, he was hired as a writer on Michael J. Fox's sitcom Spin City... and was quickly promoted to showrunner. Rosenthal married a fellow Spin City writer, bought a house and a Porsche, and landed a lucrative $2.5 million contract with Fox Television. By all accounts, Rosenthal seemed to have the perfect life.

But that's just the surface.

Going through my rolodex of Hollywood contacts, I stumbled upon someone who had actually worked with Dave Rosenthal in the past. I asked if I could ask her a few questions about Rosenthal and she agreed, as long as I maintained her anonymity. For that purpose, I'll refer to her by the pseudonym "Julia Thorn." (Ten points to whoever gets the reference.) A few years ago, "Julia" had worked in the same office as Rosenthal and became close to him.

I asked "Julia" how she would describe Rosenthal, based on the time they worked together. "When I knew him I felt like I had him pegged," she said. "He had just come off a big show, had lots of money, he was very young and successful and wanted to take advantage of it. He was always nice to me, but he definitely had this very arrogant air about him. It was like an air of entitlement or something. Like he was invincible and at the top of the world... My boss used to always say that his crash was coming soon, because he rose too fast, too easily."

And so did he crash? "The guy quit Spin City in order to concentrate on writing a play about his desire to have sex with Heidi Klum," Julia told me. "Dropped out of TV completely to do this. He pretty much had a breakdown, dropped out of society, and became the madman writing a misogynist play. He lived like this until his dad read the play and actually had him committed."

What?!? After speaking to Julia, I did some more digging. Rosenthal had in fact written a play called "Love" about his quest to get supermodel Heidi Klum to have sex with him. Reviews of the play, which apparently contained so many profanities that it rated an NC-17, were not kind. The New York Times called Rosenthal's play "not only offensive but incompetent" and said that the way that Rosenthal talked about Klum--whom he had met during a guest stint on Rosenthal's show Spin City--was "as cruel and disgusting as actual stalking."

The New York Times reviewer wasn't the only one perturbed by Rosenthal's play. Rosenthal had sent copies to his then agents at Endeavor--Ari Emanuel and Richard Weitz--who promptly dropped him as a client. His rabbi father, after reading the play, had Rosenthal briefly committed at UCLA Medical Center. Wait, what?

In 2001, Rosenthal appeared on Howard Stern's radio show and spoke about the incident. While I was unable to obtain a transcript of Rosenthal's appearance on the show, I did manage to find a fan site which paraphrased the appearance. According to site MarksFriggin.com, "David said he flew into L.A. one day after working in Miami and his father was there with two bodyguards who told him to come along peaceably or they'd have to take him by force. He was then committed to a mental hospital where they tried to make him take drugs. David said his lawyer sister was able to get him out when she threatened his father with a lawsuit. Howard found all of this fascinating. According to David there's a law in California that says a family member can have you committed to a mental institution for 72 hours if they tell a psychologist that you're mental."
So, how had Rosenthal, a formerly brilliant, determined, and successful writer, hit rock bottom? According to Janet Reitman in her aforementioned Los Angeles Times Magazine profile, the problem was Rosenthal's sudden and complete infatuation with Klum:
"What propelled Rosenthal into his downward spiral was the sudden realization that all he really wanted from life was to have sex with supermodel Heidi Klum, an occasional guest star on Spin City whom Rosenthal describes as 'the most beautiful woman I've ever met.'

He found Klum smart, sensitive, sweet, beautiful--yet another revelation, given that, as an industry man, Rosenthal had previously thought of beautiful women as 'pieces of meat.' He would marry Heidi Klum, he realized, if only she weren't already married. The idea of that was too much for him, so Rosenthal decided the sensible thing to do was to quit Fox, divorce his wife, sell his Porsche and give more than $1 million, in $52,000 grants, to 20 young women, several of whom he'd never met, but whose artistic pursuits he believed in."
A "scholarship" for young women? Rosenthal called his cash giveaway "The Creators" and there were no strings attached for the young women who received his scholarships. They were all wannabe writers or actresses, many from the assistant pool where Rosenthal worked at Fox, whom he wanted to help achieve their dreams and work on their craft. According to Reitman, Rosenthal's scholarship fund donated $1000 per week for one year to 20 women so that they could "create art--any kind of art, from writing to painting to acting." Were any of the women he supported successful? I'm not sure. What was Rosenthal's impetus to begin a project like this? Again, I'm not sure anyone but Rosenthal knows that. It's a curious juxtaposition, though: this desire to support young, creative women achieve their dreams set against what many decried as the innate misogyny of his play.

At the time Reitman wrote her profile, Rosenthal was living in virtual exile in New York, but he has since returned to Los Angeles, a city that once supported and then shunned him, and is now poised to take over as showrunner on Gilmore Girls. I asked "Julia" what she thought of the announcement. "Apparently, he did get a lot of help when he was committed, and I imagine he came back to Hollywood with his tail between his legs to a certain extent, so I think he is grateful to have the job," she told me. "I don't think that anyone can really run [Gilmore Girls] besides Amy and Dan. I think this is going to be like Aaron Sorkin leaving West Wing. I think [Rosenthal] is a decent choice, but the show will never be Gilmore Girls again."

We may never know the reason behind the decision to replace Amy Sherman-Palladino with Rosenthal as Gilmore Girls' showrunner and my research has only left me with more questions than answers. I am trying to separate my own feelings about the hand-over, yet I can't help but feel that Rosenthal is an odd choice to run a show about two intelligent and headstrong women.

What's On Tonight

8 pm: The King of Queens/How I Met Your Mother (CBS); Deal or No Deal (NBC); 7th Heaven (WB); Wife Swap (ABC); Prison Break (FOX); Major League Baseball (UPN)

9 pm: Two and a Half Men/The New Adventures of Old Christine (CBS); The Apprentice (NBC); Everwood (WB); Supernanny (ABC); 24 (FOX)

10 pm: CSI: Miami (CBS); Medium (NBC); What About Brian (ABC)

What I'll Be Watching

7 pm: Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations. (That's 10 pm for you East Coasters... or Left Coasters who'd rather catch the later showing.)

This week, everyone's favorite sarcastic chef, writer, and Travel Channel host jets off to Sweden, the land of model-esque women, meatballs, and modular furniture.

8 pm: 5 Takes: Pacific Rim.

This week, the gang heads to the eerily sounding Northern Territory of Australia. Honestly, I don't care what they do, I love this show that much.

9:30 pm: Old Christine.

In tonight's episode ("Teach Your Children Well"), Christine throws an arts-and-crafts party for son Ritchie, instead of giving into pressure to throw a glitzy affair. It's a kid's birthday party, Christine, I'm on your side. Play some pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey, unwrap some presents, hand out some cake, and call it a day.

10 pm: Elizabeth I.

Rather than miss all of the above, I'll catch the second airing of Part 2 of HBO's lavish biopic of Queen Elizabeth I over on HBO2. Elizabeth (the incomparable Helen Mirren), torn between the Earl of Leicester and the Earl of Essex, must balance her personal desires with a strategic marriage. Will she give in? Something--namely history--tells me no.

"Gilmore Girls" Creator Sherman-Palladino to Leave Stars Hollow

In a move that is less surprising than it is depressing, Gilmore Girls creator Amy Sherman-Palladino has announced that she is leaving the show that she created and guided over the last six seasons, reportedly turning down what was a nearly $5 million paycheck, according to Variety. Sherman-Palladino's husband, Gilmore Girls writer-producer Daniel Palladino, will also be departing.

The studio behind Gilmore Girls, Warner Bros. Television, immediately announced Sherman-Palladino's successor, Gilmore veteran Dave Rosenthal, who will step in as the showrunner for the long-running drama when it moves to the new CW network this fall. (Well, that bit hasn't been officially announced yet, but Gilmore Girls is pretty much a lock for the CW's fall schedule.)

Warner Bros. TV reportedly offered Sherman-Palladino and her husband a one-year deal worth nearly $5 million if she signed on for the seventh season of Gilmore Girls, most likely the drama's final season. However, both Sherman-Palladino and Palladino wanted a two-year deal, which Warner Bros. TV could not agree to since there are no deals in place for either the series or the cast to return after next season.

WBTV and the CW had the following to say, in an official statement released jointly by the studio and network:

"While we are disappointed that Amy Sherman-Palladino and Dan Palladino have decided not to stay with the show next season, we are very confident that Dave Rosenthal, an experienced writer-producer with the show, will make the transition seamless moving into the seventh year of Gilmore Girls."
Unfortunately, I couldn't agree less.

I mean no disrespect to Dave Rosenthal, but most likely this season's finale of Gilmore Girls will be the last episode I watch. To me, the show is the supremely gifted love child of Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino. Combined, they have written more than 90 episodes of Gilmore Girls and it is those episodes in which the show, its many multi-layered characters, and its trademark dialogue truly shine. Without Amy and Daniel at the helm--as Gilmore Girls had been for much of this current season--the show just isn't the same. It feels lackluster and forced, instead of the show that I have followed and loved for so many years.

To Amy and Daniel, I can only say this: thank you for six magical years of wonderful, poignant, hilarious, and touching stories. And whatever you do next, I'll be watching.

Checking in with the "Girls"

After what seemed fairly like an eternity, last night finally brought loyal Gilmore Girls viewers what they've been waiting for: a new episode, the first since February. So, the question is: was last night's Gilmore Girls ("I'm OK, You're OK") a triumph or a tragedy?

If asked, I'd have to fall on the side of it being a certifiable tragedy. Seriously, what has gone wrong with this once great show? Coming off of a season that many argued was a return to form, this sixth season has been slovenly, slow, and just plain oddly plotted at times. Each episode seems haunted by the lack of Amy Sherman-Palladino and husband/creative equal Daniel Palladino, who in my mind embody the spirit and vision of Gilmore Girls. Without them, the series just feels... painfully average.

Yes, I know that they can't write every single episode (though I would really, really, really like them to) and that no one on the writing staff can even come close to their rapier wit and Howard Hawks-esque dialogue, but who is steering the Gilmore ship? Granted, we had a great run for a bit back there in February when the episodes were nearly entirely written by Amy or Daniel. It was like a shot of B-12. Characters returned to themselves, the dialogue came fast and furious (and most importantly was outright funny again), and storylines pushed forward with the strength of Hannibal crossing the Alps.

But then a (not so) funny thing happened. Other members of the writing staff took over the scripting chores and the show went on a binge of repeats for over a month. When we returned--mere minutes after the unintentional February "cliffhanger"--it was as if those episodic gems had never happened. Rory moved back in with frenemy Paris... and then five minutes into last night's episode moved back out. Paris and boyfriend Doyle reunited as did Rory and her philandering boyfriend Logan (never has "We were on a break!" sounded more pathetic than it did now). And then Rory showed up in Stars Hollow to surprise Lorelai, who still hasn't dealt with her fiance Luke pushing her out of the relationship to spend more time with his newfound daughter April.

The effect was as startling as it was depressing. I spent the first ten minutes of last night's episode with a painfully fake smile plastered to my face, as though I were willing myself to like the episode and to stop finding fault with the show's suddenly zany logic (Richard and Emily are looking for a house in Stars Hollow?!?). What happened to the fact that Emily spilled the beans about Lorelai's impending nuptials to everyone she knows and took out a wedding announcement in the local paper... for a wedding that Luke and Lorelai postponed but never bothered to deal Emily about? We've had two episodes since then and this plotline is still dangling in the wind like a downed power line.

The treatment of the once-strong supporting cast is equally astonishing. The once amusing snark of Independence Inn co-worker Michel has turned sour as poor Michel is given nothing to do but throw a drawn-out and decidedly unamusing snit every few episodes (last night's was about Rory misusing his colored Post-It Notes; before that it was about Luke fixing things around the inn--thrilling, I know). The same goes for Richard and Emily, who seemed to virtually disappear during the second half of the season, only to now show up unannounced in Stars Hollow, house hunting. Now, I assume it's a misunderstanding on Lorelai's part and they are actually looking for a house for Lorelai and Luke as a wedding present, since the Gilmore Seniors don't like Stars Hollow and I doubt they could find an expansive and expensive manse as theirs in genteel Hartford.

Which is odd, then, that Rory's former friend Lane has gotten so much screen time this season. Her storyline--Korean girl with a strict religious mother becomes a drummer in a rock band, moves out, and starts dating her non-Korean bandmate Zach--reached a zenith last season when Lane's mom, Mrs. Kim, sent Lane and the band on a tour of Christian colleges. I assumed that would be a perfect way to phase out Lane, especially as she and Rory have had maybe three conversations together in the last three years or so and have drifted inexoribly apart. Don't get me wrong, I love Lane and I love the actress (Keiko Agena) who has played her for the last six years. But to continue to focus so much time and energy on a supporting character who now seems to hold up half the show (without interacting with the main characters) is an exercise in futility.

I had my doubts about the whole Luke-has-a-daughter storyline but, during February sweeps at least, the show won me over... especially due to the strength of the actress playing April (Vanessa Marano). But lately the show is just treading water. Luke and Lorelai barely speak and neither of them seems to want to confront the fact that April is indirectly tearing them apart. Likewise, Rory's idea to spy on April's mom Anna (guest star Sherilyn Fenn, gorgeous as ever) seemed like something that would come out of Lorelai's mouth and not the other way around. And her disclination to deal with the Logan issue (shouldn't he, caring boyfriend that he claims to be, have called the police when he couldn't find Rory for three days?), instead of highlighting the parallels between Rory and Lorelai, just felt clunky and useless. In a show about talking (and talking and talking), why are the character not saying anything of any importance?

I was shocked to discover at the end that there are only four more episodes remaining before we get to the season finale. Can we get the Girls back in line? Or is it too late for this once amazing show?

What’s On Tonight

8 pm: The Amazing Race (CBS); Deal or No Deal (NBC); One Tree Hill (WB); George Lopez/Freddie (ABC); Bones (FOX); America's Next Top Model (UPN)

9 pm: Criminal Minds (CBS); Law & Order (NBC); The Bedford Diaries (WB); Lost (ABC); American Idol/Unan1mous (FOX); Veronica Mars (UPN)

10 pm: CSI: New York (CBS); Heist (NBC); The Evidence (ABC)

What I’ll Be Watching

8 pm: The Amazing Race.

Now in its new Wednesday timeslot. On tonight's episode ("Sleep Deprivation Is Really Starting to Irritate Me"), several teams manage to get lost while attempting to find a clue in Sicily; teams also encounter a roadblock that requires them to score a goal in kayak polo against professional players.

(As an aside, I have no comments on the recent discovery of, er, certain incriminating photographs that have emerged of Racers Eric, Jeremy, BJ, and Tyler. But if you wish to check out the stomach-churning pics--which are decidedly Not Safe for Work, I won't stop you.)

8 pm: America's Next Top Model.

I'll be switching over at commerical breaks to America's Next Top Model. On a new episode of ANTM ("The Girl With Two Bad Takes"), the girls have to improvise acting in a cosmetics commercial. Me, I'm just watching to find out what the hell is up with those promos showing Tyra falling off the couch. Gee, could she be... faking?

9 pm: Lost.

Wow, we seem to have gotten quite a string of new Lost episodes lately (there's also another new episode next week as well). On tonight's episode ("Dave"), Hurley turns to his crush Libby for help when he begins having visions of his friend (Dave perhaps?) from the looney bin. Just don't fall off that cliff, big guy. Meanwhile, the Other Formerly Known as Henry Gale provides the castaways with some new information, causing Locke to have a bit of a crisis.

Oh, as it's a Lost episode focusing on the Big Guy, it's only fitting that tonight's episode is a big one too: it runs 65 minutes in fact. Be sure to set your TiVo (or VCR, but really, who uses one anymore) to run a few minutes over, just in case...

9 pm: Veronica Mars.

On tonight's episode ("Plan B"), Weevil asks everyone's favorite teenage sleuth (that would be Veronica M.) for help unmasking Felix's real killer. Let's hope she has better luck with that than solving the mystery of the serial rapist from last week. But at least Rob Thomas and the writers are getting around to solving some of the 240 mysteries that have been hanging around this season. I just hope they don't solve the mystery of where Jackie's been. That girl bugs.

10 pm: Top Chef.

Or if you're watching Lost (remember, 65 minutes tonight!), catch the 11 pm re-airing of tonight's Top Chef episode ("Blind Confusion)." Tonight, contestants face a challenge where they must serve their fusion dishes from street carts. Meanwhile, Lee Anne learns two things that Top Chef viewers have known for a while now: that Stephen is hands down the whitest man in San Francisco and that he is truly quite terrible with people.

"Gilmore Girls": What a Difference a Week Makes

We were thisclose to recapturing the wit, energy, and spark of Gilmore Girls with the last few episodes, penned by the ever-wonderful show's creator, Amy Sherman Palladino. The first half of the season--which saw a lack of any episodes written by Amy or her writer-producer husband Daniel Palladino--devolved into a soppy mess wherein Rory and Lorelai went their separate ways after a fanastic and brilliant season finale. While the concept behind the jaw-dropping split made sense (with Rory dropping out of Yale, moving out of Lorelai's house, and moving in with grandparents-from-hell Richard and Emily), the execution was extremely flawed to say the least... especially without Amy and Daniel at the helm.

So imagine my excitement when we had two back-to-back brand new episodes written by Amy herself! We got back the Gilmore Girls of yesteryear--snappy repartee, the best ever Friday night dinner with Emily and Richard, the Gilmore girls reuniting, Rory moving in with Paris and returning to Yale, true and real emotional connections between my beloved characters. Even the ridiculous plotline with Luke discovering he had a twelve-year-old daughter suddenly made sense and took on new dimensions and depth. I was in heaven, envisioning a brilliant second half of a lackluster season...

And then I watched last night's episode. And was sucked back to earth.

It wasn't...bad. It just wasn't very good, especially coming off Amy's two episodes. The scenes seemed awkward, the dialogue stilted and overwritten, the Michel plotline mind-bogglingly dull and out-of-place (I'm sure Yanic has a certain number of episodes committment and this was counting towards that after not being seen for a while). Plus, Rory had helmet head. Not a good look for the girl. Especially, when she's been looking so gorgeous of late.

The lesson: an Amy-and-Daniel-free Gilmore Girls is not a Good Thing. With the show a near lock to return next season on the new CW network, I can only hope that they renew their executive producer deals and bring them on board for next season (and any subsequent ones). I'm sad for the loss of the new show they'd been working on (reportedly a Philadelphia Story-esque romantic dramedy), but hope this means that they can stay on Gilmore Girls at least for a little while longer.

Fortunately, I checked my TiVo as soon as the episode ended to see who had written next week's episode... and was relieved to see it was written by Daniel. I breathe a sigh of relief. While we never know what life may bring us next, at least I know I'm in store for a top-notch episode of Gilmore Girls next week.

What a difference a week makes.

Gilmore Girls airs Tuesday evenings at 8 pm on the WB (for now, anyway).